Review Policy

JOLT-I follows a double-blind peer review process to ensure a fair and honest review. The reviewers are required to declare any potential conflict of interest before they agree to review a Contribution. 

The journal rests on a rigorous, systematic and transparent review process where each Contribution is assessed by reviewer(s) based on a well-defined set of parameters framed by the editorial board to strengthen fairness and neutrality. Strict compliance with the reviewer’s recommendations is ensured before publication. 

In tandem with the spirit of being a public institution, we do not charge payment in any form, whether fee or otherwise, for publication in JOLT-I.