Psychological Capital (PsyCap) and Counterproductive Work Behaviour: Organizational Identification as a Mediator

Authors

  • Akshita Kamra Counseling Psychologist, Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi Author
  • Anam Amin Department of Psychology, Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi Author
  • Dr. Mohammed Shahnawaz Ghazi Department of Psychology, Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi Author

Keywords:

PsyCap, CWBs, Organizational identification, Mediation analysis

Abstract

The present research aims to address two of the major gaps in PsyCap literature: investigating the processes (mediators/moderators) by which PsyCap influences outcomes, and testing PsyCap in a non-western context. The present study thus examined the relationship between PsyCap and employee counterproductive work behaviours (CWBs) through organisational identification (OID) in the Indian context. The current study used a quantitative survey-based research approach and has collected data from 204 employees from the Delhi-NCR region. PCQ-24 (Luthans et al. 2007), counterproductive work behaviour checklist (Spector, Bauer, & Fox, 2010), and organisational identification questionnaire (OIQ; Cheney, 1983) were used to measure PsyCap, CWBS, and organisational identification respectively. Data were analysed using SPSS. Descriptive analysis and mediation analysis were used to analyse the data. PsyCap was found to be positively related to OID, and negatively to CWBs. Mediation analysis showed that organisational identification mediated the relationship between PsyCap and CWBs having a large effect size. Future implications of the current research have been discussed.

8 3

Downloads

Published

2022-02-01

How to Cite

Psychological Capital (PsyCap) and Counterproductive Work Behaviour: Organizational Identification as a Mediator. (2022). The Learning Curve, 11, 12-19. https://dup.du.ac.in/index.php/LC/article/view/1195